Avoiding blockchain for blockchain’s sake: Three real use case criteria

Blockchain use case funnel 2016-17

2016 was the year of creating frameworks and filters to determine if a business problem was worthy of a blockchain-based solution.  Often, the frameworks would declare inappropriate potential use cases as ripe for blockchaining, as the frameworks were often designed by blockchain vendors or consultants to let as much through as possible.  However, many of the proofs of concepts built in 2016-17 have not become industrial solutions.  Why?

Two main reasons are:

  1. The technology didn’t meet the requirements of the use case
  2. The use cases themselves were selected badly

This post discusses what went wrong with use case selection, and presents two new and better questions for use case selection.

Continue reading “Avoiding blockchain for blockchain’s sake: Three real use case criteria”

Blockchains and cyberwar: Why the next wave of interbank settlement systems will be decentralised

Currently a number of central banks around the world are exploring two things:

  1. A decentralised interbank payment system
  2. A central bank digital currency

Though often conflated, these are slightly different concepts.  You can decentralise your interbank payment systems without allowing the public to have digital access to the central bank’s balance sheet, and vice versa.

This short post is about the first set of experiments: decentralising the interbank payment systems.

Continue reading “Blockchains and cyberwar: Why the next wave of interbank settlement systems will be decentralised”

Distributed ledgers: “Confirm-as-you-go”

Following on from the “Blockchain is a solution looking for a problem” narrative of 2016, distributed ledger technology has evolved.

Distributed ledgers – databases with shared control over what and how data is added – can be seen a strategic solution to the “reconciliation” workaround that we have had to put up with until now. This strategic solution is applicable to all industries, not just financial services.

Distributed ledgers: "Confirm-as-you-go"

Continue reading “Distributed ledgers: “Confirm-as-you-go””

KPMG Report on Consensus: Interview with co-author George Samman

Q&A with George Samman, co-author of KPMG’s report: “Consensus: Immutable agreement for the Internet of value”

This interview is posted on both www.sammantics.com and www.bitsonblocks.net. Interviewer is Antony Lewis (AL) and interviewee is George Samman (GS).

Continue reading “KPMG Report on Consensus: Interview with co-author George Samman”

No, “Blockchain” is not a solution looking for a problem

I have heard this comment many times:

“Blockchain” is a solution looking for a problem.

 

That is incorrect – here’s the problem statement, originally articulated in 2008:
Bitcoin whitepaper

The problem statement, to paraphrase, is

“How do people pay each other electronically without being at the behest of Financial Institutions?”

The proposed solution is:

“Bitcoin”

Continue reading “No, “Blockchain” is not a solution looking for a problem”

Confused by blockchains? Revolution vs Evolution

Cryptocurrencies vs Industry Workflow Tools

This article attempts to explain the difference between the revolutionary disruptive innovation of bitcoin and the evolutionary efficiency innovations of industry workflow tools, and why calling them both “blockchains”, even as a generic term, is incredibly confusing.
Cryptocurrencies vs Industry Workflow Tools

For the rest of this post, I will use the phrase “industry workflow tools” instead of industry blockchains, as some of the emerging solutions being proposed in this space are not blockchains (eg, R3’s Corda is not a blockchain but Digital Asset’s solutions are – however, both companies are proposing industry workflow tools).

Continue reading “Confused by blockchains? Revolution vs Evolution”